Smart Incentives
  • Home
  • About
  • Partners
  • Our Work
  • Resources
  • Featured Reports
    • Featured Reports
  • Events
  • Blogs
  • Contact
Select Page
Unique state incentives tackle skills gap

Unique state incentives tackle skills gap

by Smart Incentives | Feb 22, 2021 | Incentive programs

Oklahoma created two incentives over a decade ago to help address a skills gap that made it difficult for employers to fill aerospace engineering positions in the state. One incentive is a tax credit for aerospace employers based on compensation paid to qualified...
Incentives proposed to increase investment in workers

Incentives proposed to increase investment in workers

by Ellen D. Harpel | Feb 15, 2021 | Incentive programs

Senator Mark Warner (D, VA) recently published an article describing a set of proposals, including federal incentives, to increase investment in workers. Workforce development and talent availability are top issues for all economic developers, so below we summarize...

Recent Posts

  • Top 5 Smart Incentives stories of 2022
  • Showing Impact: Reporting on Federal Funds for Community Development
  • Compliance data drives smart incentive programs
  • Evolving incentives for today’s priorities
  • Streamlining applications helps small business

Recent Comments

  • Matt Adams on Why we need a compliance roadmap
  • Jeff Stell on New initiative will address hiring incentives for individuals with disabilities
  • Randall Bauer on Incentive evaluations lead to statutory changes
  • Eric Cromwell on Do angel investor tax credits work?
  • Jose Luis Navarro Espigares on Service industries and economic transformation

Archives

  • December 2022
  • November 2022
  • October 2022
  • September 2022
  • August 2022
  • July 2022
  • June 2022
  • May 2022
  • April 2022
  • March 2022
  • February 2022
  • January 2022
  • December 2021
  • November 2021
  • October 2021
  • September 2021
  • August 2021
  • July 2021
  • June 2021
  • May 2021
  • April 2021
  • March 2021
  • February 2021
  • January 2021
  • December 2020
  • November 2020
  • October 2020
  • September 2020
  • August 2020
  • July 2020
  • June 2020
  • May 2020
  • March 2020
  • February 2020
  • January 2020
  • December 2019
  • November 2019
  • October 2019
  • September 2019
  • August 2019
  • July 2019
  • June 2019
  • May 2019
  • April 2019
  • March 2019
  • February 2019
  • January 2019
  • December 2018
  • November 2018
  • October 2018
  • September 2018
  • August 2018
  • July 2018
  • June 2018
  • May 2018
  • April 2018
  • March 2018
  • February 2018
  • January 2018
  • December 2017
  • November 2017
  • October 2017
  • September 2017
  • August 2017
  • July 2017
  • June 2017
  • May 2017
  • April 2017
  • March 2017
  • February 2017
  • January 2017
  • December 2016
  • November 2016
  • October 2016
  • September 2016
  • August 2016
  • July 2016
  • June 2016
  • May 2016
  • April 2016
  • March 2016
  • February 2016
  • January 2016
  • December 2015
  • November 2015
  • October 2015
  • September 2015
  • August 2015
  • July 2015
  • June 2015
  • May 2015
  • April 2015
  • March 2015
  • February 2015
  • January 2015
  • December 2014
  • November 2014
  • October 2014
  • September 2014
  • August 2014
  • July 2014
  • June 2014
  • May 2014
  • April 2014
  • March 2014
  • February 2014
  • January 2014
  • December 2013
  • November 2013
  • October 2013
  • September 2013
  • August 2013
  • July 2013
  • June 2013
  • May 2013
  • April 2013
  • March 2013
  • February 2013

Categories

  • Amazon
  • equitable economic development
  • Incentive programs
  • Integrated housing and economic development
  • Opportunity Zones
  • Program Evaluation
  • Sustainability
  • Sustainable development
  • Uncategorized

Meta

  • Log in
  • Entries feed
  • Comments feed
  • WordPress.org
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • RSS

Designed by Elegant Themes | Powered by WordPress